Final answer:
Art creation and appreciation differ greatly between industrial and non-industrial societies, with the former categorizing specialized artwork as 'fine art' and the latter often participating in communal art as part of daily life. Industrialization introduced new art markets and shifted the focus to individual artists whose works catered to the tastes of a middle class. Contemporary perspectives aim to dissolve historical biases and appreciate art based on skill and aesthetic value.
Step-by-step explanation:
The aspects of art creation and consumption vary significantly between industrial and non-industrial societies. In non-industrial societies, art creation is often a communal activity with everyone having the skills to create daily-life objects such as basketry and textiles, which are sometimes not acknowledged as 'fine art' by Eurocentric standards. Conversely, in industrial societies, art tends to be produced by specialized professionals and is often viewed in terms of its economic value, with an increased focus on individual artists and their works, shaped by the dynamics of trade, market demand, and technological advancements.
Artistic patronage has shifted from religious and ruling leaders to a broader audience, including the emerging middle class, who favored genres such as landscapes and genre scenes. Locations for art display have moved from aristocratic control to public venues such as museums, democratizing art's accessibility. Moreover, technological advances in industrial societies have facilitated new forms of art by allowing artists to extract themselves from nature's constraints and explore new aesthetic territories.
Issues of what constitutes 'fine art' versus 'craft' are often tied to historical biases. Nowadays, the focus is on leveling the playing field, recognizing the skill and aesthetics of art, irrespective of the medium or the artist's background.