Final answer:
The status of women in the context of marriage is complex and varies widely. While marriage could enhance a woman's status in some cases, it often meant legal control by her husband, and the notion of women being 'incapable' during wartime overlooks their historical resilience.
Step-by-step explanation:
The given statement, 'Women have a high status in bride status' is not universally true or false as the status of women in the context of marriage varies greatly by culture, time period, and individual circumstances. Historically, in many societies, marriage could indeed enhance a woman's status, especially if she brought a significant dowry into the union. However, it also often meant coming under the legal control of her husband. For example, women in the Revolutionary Era in the United States did not have the right to vote, a status that did not change until the ratification of the 19th Amendment.
Furthermore, assertions such as 'Many women found themselves incapable of handling the burdens of war when their husbands and fathers went off to fight' could misrepresent the historical resilience and capabilities of women. While some may have struggled, many women took on significant roles during wartime, managing home fronts, businesses, and even engaging in war efforts directly. As for the 'Cult of Domesticity', this did allow for differentiation between classes, indicating that the social constructs surrounding high status were multifaceted.
So, when examining the status of women in history, it is important to recognize the complexity and variability of their experiences, which could shift significantly depending on a multitude of factors, including but not limited to, their marital status.