Final answer:
Noam Chomsky does not believe that monkeys have a language acquisition device; he proposed that this is a uniquely human attribute. Chomsky's theory focuses on humans' innate capacity to learn complex languages, which differs from the simpler communication observed in other species.
Step-by-step explanation:
Noam Chomsky challenged B. F. Skinner's behaviorist view of language acquisition, proposing instead that humans have an innate capacity to learn language through a mechanism he called the Language Acquisition Device (LAD). However, the assertion that Noam Chomsky believes in the presence of a language acquisition device in monkeys is false. While Chomsky's theory posits that human beings are born with a predisposition to acquire language, he does not extend this theory to monkeys. Nevertheless, it is acknowledged that non-human primates and certain other animals are capable of using symbolic systems for communication in a rule-based manner, which suggests the potential for a protolanguage. Chomsky's LAD is specifically related to the unique complexities of human language and its acquisition, which is significantly more advanced than the communicative abilities observed in other species.