22.6k views
0 votes
How is this bad archeology? Bad science? Hint: pay attention to facts/evidence vs. assertions here, and what kinds of evidence used (if at all).

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

In archaeology, accurate, verifiable evidence and respectful practices towards cultural heritage are essential for credible research. Claims without evidence, or those ignoring ethical considerations, indicate 'bad archaeology'. The integration of traditional knowledge with modern technology is advancing both archaeological and ethical standards.

Step-by-step explanation:

Archaeology involves the meticulous study of past human activities through the examination of artifacts and fossils. This field asserts a high value on evidence, which includes objects like tools or pottery, as well as excavation records, photos, and videos. Good archaeological practice is grounded in fact-checking, verifying evidence, and acknowledging potential biases that may influence interpretations. This approach contrasts 'bad archaeology', which can arise from asserting claims without evidence, failing to properly document findings, or being swayed by bias rather than facts. It's essential to value and respect the ancestral items and human remains as they relate to living communities, hence engaging with local traditions and permissions.

When studying archaeology, it's important to recognize that facts and verifiable evidence are at the core of credible science. Scholars should focus on evidence that can be verified and apply the standards and expectations for evidence that pertain to the field of archaeology. It is critical to incorporate cross-disciplinary information effectively, for instance, how historians use archaeological data to construct narratives of the past. Rigorous scientific methodologies, coupled with respect for cultural heritage, promote a holistic and ethical approach in the sciences.

Claims about the importance of artifacts for understanding human history, such as those expressed by Elizabeth Weiss, must be balanced against ethical considerations, including the desires of Native American communities regarding the treatment of their ancestors' remains. Art historians and archaeologists are thus increasingly recognizing the significance of blending traditional knowledge with scientific technology. Documenting evidence properly ensures it can support current analyses and inform future research.

User Gema Sanchez
by
8.2k points