Final answer:
The question explores arguments against the CPC's legitimacy, centering on the lack of political self-determination—a human right that supports the ability to determine one's own political status and development through mechanisms such as free elections and diverse political participation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the arguments against the Chinese Communist Party's (CPC's) legitimacy based on the principle of political self-determination, which is a recognized human right. Self-determination is the right of peoples to decide their own political status and pursue their economic, social, and cultural development. The United States' foreign policy has traditionally supported this right, as seen in its stance on separatist movements in Scotland and Quebec. Nonetheless, the legitimacy of a group's claim to self-determination can be contentious and complex, such as the debate surrounding indigenous peoples' claims in Canada.
Arguments against the CPC's legitimacy often cite the lack of free and fair elections and suppression of diverse political voices in China, which are essential components of self-determination. The CPC upholds the belief that it is the sole legitimate political power, which is at odds with the principle of self-determination. The pro-democracy protests in places like Hong Kong demonstrate a push against these limitations. Furthermore, indigenous governance agreements, like those achieved by the Métis in Canada, illustrate movements towards achieving self-determination.