Final answer:
Wikipedia is most useful for topics like the development of Pokémon Go and the musical Hamilton, as they do not require scholarly sources, while it is less suited for research on global warming or to find scholarly sources for a physics project.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering which two examples of search topics would most likely yield useful results in Wikipedia, one must understand the nature of Wikipedia as a source. It is a valuable tool for general information but may not provide the depth required for academic research in certain fields. The two topics from the choices provided that would be best suited for Wikipedia research are information on how Pokémon Go was developed and information about the popular Broadway musical Hamilton. Both topics pertain to cultural phenomena and do not necessarily require scholarly sources for a basic understanding.
Conversely, Wikipedia may not be the most appropriate source for reliable and objective information on global warming due to the complex scientific debates and need for peer-reviewed research in the field. Similarly, it would not be suitable for finding scholarly sources to cite for a college course project in physics, as Wikipedia does not qualify as a scholarly source and often lacks the rigorous citations required for academic work.