Final answer:
Noam Chomsky views democracy and freedom as challenges to inequality, not enablers of it, which makes the statement in the question False. Modernization theory does not conclusively link economic growth with democracy, and democracy's imperfections do not mean it's not preferable to other government forms.
Step-by-step explanation:
Political activist Noam Chomsky's viewpoints suggest that democracy and freedom can indeed pose as obstacles to the spread of inequality and cronyism. This is in stark contrast to systems that are less democratic, where those in power can more easily manipulate the system to their advantage. It is False to assert that Chomsky proposed democracy and freedom as enablers of inequality and cronyism, rather than as challenges to these issues. When it comes to the relationship between economic growth and democratic institutions, modernization theory has not established a definitive causal link. Meanwhile, the statement that best expresses why the United States is not a true democracy might be (c) Citizens elect representatives who vote on their behalf to make policy, due to the fact that in a pure democracy, citizens would vote on policy decisions directly. Additionally, democracy and capitalism do not necessarily coexist seamlessly, as evidenced by the inequality seen in many capitalist societies. Scholars like Przeworski and Limongi recognize that economic development may not directly cause democracies to form, but higher levels of development do support the endurance of democratic regimes once they are established. Overall, while democracy is not perfect, and might sometimes lead to economically unwise decisions, it's considered preferable to the alternatives.