At least one of Marren's three dogs stole the cupcakes, as they were missing when unattended, and a long, white dog hair was found near them. Petal's involvement is uncertain.
Let's analyze the information given:
1. Marren made a dozen cupcakes.
2. Cupcakes were left unattended, and several were missing when she returned.
3. A long, white dog hair was found near the cupcakes.
4. Only Marren's 3 dogs were home at the time.
Now let's look at the statements:
- **Goldie has a brown coat.**
- This statement provides information about Goldie's coat color but doesn't directly relate to the cupcake incident.
- **Petal would never steal food without Titus.**
- This statement implies that if Petal stole food, Titus would be involved. However, it doesn't provide direct evidence about the cupcake incident.
- **At least one of the dogs stole the cupcakes.**
- This statement is a generalization based on the fact that the cupcakes were missing and the presence of a dog hair. It doesn't specify which dog is responsible.
Based on the given information, the only statement that accurately describes the situation is:
- **At least one of the dogs stole the cupcakes.**
The other statements provide information about the dogs but don't directly address the cupcake incident.