Final answer:
Scientific evidence demonstrates that race is not a valid biological construct, leading to the possibility that individuals may share more genes in common with people from different races than with those of their own race.
Step-by-step explanation:
Can an individual in one so-called race have more genes in common with a member of a different race than with anyone in their own race? The concept of race within a biological context is often challenged by experts in anthropology, biology, and genetics. While race often encompasses physical characteristics, these do not strictly dictate genetic similarity.
Current scientific understanding based on genetic research indicates that genetic markers aligned with traditional racial categories are few, and there can be significant genetic variation within these categories. This variation results in individuals from ostensibly different races potentially having more genetic markers in common with each other than they might with individuals within their assumed race.
Statistically and scientifically, the concept of race fails to form cohesive genetic groupings. Emphasizing ancestry over race may provide a more accurate understanding of human genetic diversity. It is well established now that the human population cannot be biologically divided into discrete racial categories; thus, it is entirely possible that an individual can share more genetic similarities with someone outside their socially-constructed race than with others within it.