Final answer:
The Roman Inquisition's torture trials differed significantly from modern legal systems in terms of procedures, rights, and the use of torture.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Roman Inquisition's torture trials were vastly different from modern legal systems in terms of procedure, rights of the accused, and use of torture. Unlike today's legal systems that emphasize due process and the presumption of innocence, the Roman Inquisition operated under the assumption of guilt and demanded suspects to prove their innocence.
Torture was a common practice during the Roman Inquisition, used to extract confessions and punish suspects. Suspected heretics faced torture to force them to confess or face execution. In contrast, modern legal systems prohibit the use of torture as a method of obtaining evidence or extracting confessions due to ethical and human rights considerations.
Additionally, the Roman Inquisition often relied on hearsay, anonymous accusations, and the seizing of individuals' property to perpetuate the persecution of heretics. In contrast, modern legal systems require reliable evidence and testimonies to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.