Final answer:
The style where the listener (reader) cannot question the writer (speaker) is known as Frozen style, featuring fixed and formal language with little interaction. It is seen in formal settings like courtrooms or religious ceremonies, contrasting with the Formal, Casual, and Consultative styles that allow more interaction.
Step-by-step explanation:
The style in which the listener (reader) is not allowed to question the writer (speaker) is referred to as Frozen style. This communication style is characterized by fixed and formal language. One might encounter this style in contexts such as judicial settings, religious sermons, or formal ceremonies, where interaction between the speaker and the audience is either limited or non-existent. On the other hand, the Formal style is still respectful and conventional but allows for some degree of interaction, unlike the Frozen style. Casual and Consultative styles, conversely, allow for much more interaction and a more personal tone.
When assessing the rhetorical situation, which includes the narrator, message, audience, purpose, context, and culture, the Frozen style typically demonstrates little or no allowance for feedback or variation in sentence structure. Similarly, the annotation's third-person perspective, devoid of first-person pronouns like 'me' and 'I', suggests a more detached and formal tone aligned with Frozen style communication. Conversely, a writer showing occasional awareness of the rhetorical situation might be employing a style closer to the Formal or Consultative styles, where there is a blend of formality and interaction.