Final answer:
When social mobility is non-existent and society has closed systems of stratification, upwards movement is heavily restricted by birth and systemic inequality is perpetuated, limiting personal aspirations and contributing to social unrest while dictating lifestyle and opportunities.
Step-by-step explanation:
When there is no social mobility, and the divisions between levels are fixed and rigid, the dynamics and interactions within a community can be greatly affected. In closed systems of stratification, like caste or estate systems, individuals' opportunities for upward mobility are extremely limited, often determined by their birth. This can lead to a sense of fatalism and resignation among lower classes and can foster conditions for systemic inequality, as interactions between different social strata are discouraged or even forbidden.The implications of limited social mobility in a community go beyond individual aspirations. A lack of mobility may affect the overall standard of living by creating an environment where economic and social capital are concentrated in the hands of a few, limiting the potential for innovation and economic development. Furthermore, it dictates people's lifestyle, behavior, and opportunities, as each social class will have its own norms and class traits, which are often rigid and strictly enforced. Such a system may contribute to social unrest and inhibit the community's ability to adapt to new challenges or changes.