Final answer:
An OTA representing themselves as an Occupational Therapy Practitioner violates the ethical principle of Veracity, which is the duty to provide accurate information and truthfulness about one's professional role.
Step-by-step explanation:
When an Occupational Therapy Assistant (OTA) informs a patient that they are an Occupational Therapy Practitioner, the code of ethics that is potentially being violated is Veracity. Veracity refers to the duty to tell the truth and provide accurate information. If an OTA misrepresents themselves as an Occupational Therapy Practitioner, they are not being truthful about their professional role, which is a form of deceit.
Nonmaleficence requires that actions do not cause harm, and providing false information could lead to harm through misaligned expectations or inappropriate application of therapy based on the perceived qualifications of the provider. Beneficence focuses on benefiting others and requires action that supports the well-being of clients. Finally, Justice deals with fairness and equity in the distribution of resources and respect for the rights of individuals.
In summary, an OTA claiming to be an Occupational Therapy Practitioner may mislead the patient and violate the ethical principle of veracity. The commitment is to strive to ensure accurate and truthful representations of one's qualifications, skills, and professional scope.