Final answer:
False Imprisonment is the term for unlawfully restraining someone's freedom of movement, and it is both a tort and a potential criminal offense.
This relates to broader issues of individual rights versus state power, as detailed in significant legal cases like Terry v. Ohio and Mapp v. Ohio.
Step-by-step explanation:
The term used for the unlawful restraint of someone which affects the person's freedom of movement is False Imprisonment.
False imprisonment is considered a tort (a wrong in civil law) and can also constitute a criminal offense. This act involves intentionally restricting another person's freedom to move without legal authority or the person's consent.
When compared to broader instances of restraining freedoms, such as unreasonable searches and seizures protected by the Fourth Amendment, or interrogation practices that may violate the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination, we see the importance of legal boundaries safeguarding individual rights.
In landmark cases like Terry v. Ohio and Mapp v. Ohio, we observe the judiciary's efforts to strike a balance between law enforcement requirements and the rights to personal liberty and privacy.