Final answer:
The use of deadly force against a suspect fleeing from a misdemeanor is generally not authorized and raises significant legal and societal concerns.
Step-by-step explanation:
Addressing the issue of deadly force used against suspects fleeing after committing a crime is a complex matter that intersects with legal principles and societal concerns. The Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio established that police might stop and frisk individuals if there is reasonable suspicion of a crime, but it does not directly address the use of deadly force. The cases of Eric Garner and Breonna Taylor highlight concerns about the use of excessive force, particularly when the suspects were not armed or were involved in minor offenses. While the Constitution stipulates that a person fleeing after being charged with a crime can be extradited back to the state with jurisdiction, use of force must align with both constitutional rights and police protocols which do not generally authorize deadly force for a misdemeanor. In the referenced legislative example regarding property and Class E felony, societal reactions to increased penalties reflect the balance of maintaining order and protecting civil liberties.