Final answer:
The Supreme Court has interpreted the undue burden test in the context of abortion restrictions. Under this test, restrictions on abortion can be upheld if they do not impose a substantial obstacle or undue burden on women seeking an abortion.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Supreme Court has interpreted the undue burden test in the context of abortion restrictions. In the case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992, the Court replaced the previous trimester framework with the undue burden test. This test allows restrictions on abortion prior to viability as long as they do not impose a substantial obstacle or undue burden on women seeking an abortion.
Under the undue burden test, the Supreme Court has upheld certain state restrictions on abortion, such as waiting periods, parental consent requirements, and informed consent laws. However, restrictions that are found to be an undue burden, such as laws requiring spousal notification or imposing unnecessary burdens on abortion providers, have been struck down.
It is important to note that the Supreme Court's interpretation of the undue burden test has evolved over time and may continue to evolve in future cases.