Question

What best describes Daniel Webster's position on the Compromise of 1850?

Question 14 options:

It should be rejected because the federal government must protect the rights of slavery.


It should be rejected because slavery was morally wrong and must be immediately ended.


It should be accepted because sectional peace was the most important outcome.


It should be accepted because it was a good deal for all parties involved.

Answer 1

Daniel Webster's position on the Compromise of 1850 can be described as accepting it for the sake of sectional peace. The correct answer is option 3. It should be accepted because sectional peace was the most important outcome.

Step-by-step explanation:

Daniel Webster's position on the Compromise of 1850 can best be described as accepting it because sectional peace was the most important outcome.

The Compromise of 1850 was a series of legislative measures aimed at resolving the tensions between the North and the South over the issue of slavery. While some argued for the immediate end of slavery or the protection of slavery rights, Webster believed that maintaining peace between the two sections of the country was crucial. Therefore, he supported the Compromise as a means of preserving the Union and avoiding a potential civil war.

The Compromise of 1850 included provisions such as the admission of California as a free state, the implementation of popular sovereignty in the territories, and the Fugitive Slave Act. These measures aimed to balance the interests of both the North and the South. Although the Compromise ultimately did not resolve the underlying issues and tensions between the two regions, it temporarily eased the conflicts and helped to maintain a fragile peace for a few more years.