Question

Mary, an Ohio broker, accompanied a customer to Florida and met with broker Stan in his office in Jacksonville. While Stan showed the customer property and obtained a binding contract for the purchase of a condominium, Mary took some time off and went to the beach. On returning to Stan's office, Mary discovered Stan had written a contract and demanded a share of the commission. Which statement is correct?

a. Stan may share the commission with Mary.
b. Mary violated the real estate license law by accompanying the customer to Florida.
c. If Stan pays Mary a share of the commission, Stan will be in violation of the license law.
d. If Stan pays Marya share of the commission, both Stan and Mary will be in violation of the license law.

Answer 1

If Stan pays Mary a share of the commission, both Stan and Mary will be in violation of the license law.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct statement is:

d. If Stan pays Mary a share of the commission, both Stan and Mary will be in violation of the license law.

According to the question, Mary, an Ohio broker, accompanied a customer to Florida and met with broker Stan. Mary violated the real estate license law by accompanying the customer to Florida without obtaining the proper license in Florida. Therefore, if Stan pays Mary a share of the commission, it would be considered aiding and abetting an unlicensed person, which is a violation of the license law for both Stan and Mary.