Question

however, if the challenged abortion statute in the later case is distinguishable from the Roe statute, a court may uphold the constitutionality of the challenged statute.

Answer 1

The question addresses the constitutional law related to abortion rights in the U.S., with a focus on the Supreme Court decisions in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Roe v.

Wade established the right to privacy includes a woman's right to an abortion, and Casey later adjusted the framework to the undue burden test for pre-viability restrictions.

Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of the question pertains to the constitutional law surrounding abortion rights in the United States, focusing particularly on the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Roe v. Wade and subsequent related cases.

Roe v. Wade established that the Constitution protects a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy, with this right falling under the right to privacy as recognized in Griswold v. Connecticut and protected by the 14th Amendment. However, later cases like Planned Parenthood v. Casey introduced the undue burden test which allowed for more state-level restrictions on abortion prior to fetal viability.

In the original Roe v. Wade decision, the Supreme Court created a trimester framework, allowing for state regulation focused on health in the second trimester and restrictions or bans in the third, provided the life of the pregnant woman was not at risk.

This framework was later eschewed in Casey in favor of the undue burden principle, marking a shift in the Court's approach to abortion regulation. Despite subsequent restrictions, a woman's right to an abortion remains a constitutionally protected, albeit frequently contested, right in the United States.