Final answer:
The Argument from Marginal Cases attempts to demonstrate that if animals do not have direct moral status, then neither do such humans as infants, the senile, and the severely cognitively disabled.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Argument from Marginal Cases attempts to demonstrate that if animals do not have direct moral status, then neither do such humans as infants, the senile, and the severely cognitively disabled.
Some philosophers argue that the rational ability in an individual does not determine their moral status. Instead, they propose that our moral status is grounded in our rational nature, which means that any human, regardless of their level of cognitive development, has value.
Opponents of abortion claim that the unborn are potential persons and therefore have a right to life. They argue that the right to life outweighs someone's right to bodily autonomy, which is at the center of the abortion debate.