Final answer:
The statement linking Hobbes's morality with Aristotle's Virtue Ethics is false; whereas Aristotle's ethics focus on personal virtues and flourishing, Hobbes emphasizes the need for a strong sovereign to prevent the brutishness of the state of nature.
Step-by-step explanation:
The assertion that Thomas Hobbes's conception of morality closely resembles that of Aristotle's Virtue Ethics is false. Hobbes is best known for his work in political philosophy, particularly the idea that in a state of nature people's lives are 'solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short,' leading them to create a social contract with a sovereign power to ensure peace and stability. On the other hand, Aristotle's virtue ethics emphasize the importance of developing moral character and virtues through practice and habituation within a community. Aristotle believed that happiness or eudaimonia, understood as flourishing, is the ultimate goal of human life, and achieving it requires cultivating virtues like wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice. In contrast, Hobbes's view is more cynical regarding human nature and does not place a similar emphasis on virtue for personal flourishing but rather on the necessity of a powerful government to maintain social order.