157k views
2 votes
If you were performing a study comparing the aggression levels of boys and girls, which of the following would be a suitable null hypothesis?

a) There is a significant difference in aggression levels between boys and girls.
b) There is no significant difference in aggression levels between boys and girls.
c) Boys are more aggressive than girls.
d) Girls are more aggressive than boys.

User Ray Jezek
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The suitable null hypothesis for comparing the aggression levels of boys and girls would be option b) There is no significant difference in aggression levels between boys and girls.

Step-by-step explanation:

The suitable null hypothesis for comparing the aggression levels of boys and girls would be option b) There is no significant difference in aggression levels between boys and girls. This null hypothesis assumes that there is no difference between the aggression levels of boys and girls. It is important to use a null hypothesis that does not make any specific claims about which group is more aggressive (options c and d).

User Mike Dooley
by
8.5k points