195k views
4 votes
Why did Congress not do anything against Shays' Rebellion?

a) Congress supported the rebellion.
b) Congress was powerless to act.
c) Congress was unaware of the rebellion.
d) Congress believed the rebellion was justified.

User MrBeanzy
by
8.5k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

Congress was powerless to act against Shays' Rebellion due to the limitations of the Articles of Confederation, necessitating privately funded local militias to quell the uprising, eventually leading to the Constitutional Convention.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question concerns why Congress did not act against Shays' Rebellion. The correct answer would be b) Congress was powerless to act. The Articles of Confederation provided a weak central government without the authority to raise an army to deal with such insurrections.

As the situation in Massachusetts escalated, the government realized its inability to intervene due to its limited powers. Local militias, funded through private means by concerned wealthy citizens, ultimately quelled the rebellion. The uprising highlighted the necessity of a stronger national government, leading to calls for the revising of the Articles, which eventually resulted in the drafting of the U.S. Constitution by the Constitutional Convention.

User Steven Oxley
by
7.6k points