129k views
3 votes
BMI is most accurate when assessing the health of highly muscular individuals, such as certain professional athletes.

a) True
b) False

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

BMI is not the most accurate when assessing the health of highly muscular individuals like professional athletes, as it does not distinguish between muscle and fat mass. Hence, muscular individuals may have a higher BMI that inaccurately categorizes them as overweight or obese. Alternative measurements should be used alongside BMI to assess overall health more accurately.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement 'BMI is most accurate when assessing the health of highly muscular individuals, such as certain professional athletes' is false. By calculating BMI, which is an estimate of fat content in the body, certain limitations become apparent. The BMI, or body mass index, is derived by dividing a person's weight in kilograms by the square of their height in meters. However, it does not differentiate between muscle and fat mass - crucial elements when assessing an individual's health.

Therefore, a muscular athlete with a higher proportion of muscle mass compared to fat may have an elevated BMI. This might categorily place them as overweight or obese, even though their actual health risks could be low. Contrarily, for the average person whose muscle mass is less pronounced, the BMI might provide a more accurate reflection of health risks associated with overweight and obesity.

It's important to recognize that while BMI provides a quick and inexpensive screening tool for populations, it should be supplemented with other measurements for individuals, especially when it comes to assessing highly muscular individuals like athletes. Measurements such as waist-to-hip ratios and body composition assessments are essential in providing a more comprehensive health evaluation.

User CosX
by
7.8k points