Final answer:
The given statements are historically assessed, finding that the Conciliatory Proposition did not appease American colonists' major demands, the Iroquois Confederacy did not remain neutral, recruiting native allies factored significantly into the Spanish conquest of the Aztecs, Loyalists were not well treated after the Treaty of Paris, and the treaty did overlook the interests of American Indians.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student's question pertains to four historical propositions related to various historical interactions and treaties involving the American colonists, the Iroquois Confederacy during the Revolutionary War, the Spanish conquest of the Aztec, and the treatment of American Indians in the Treaty of Paris. Analyzing these historical events:
- The Conciliatory Proposition did not result in the mother country giving in to most of the American colonists' demands, rendering the statement False.
- Not all tribes of the Iroquois Confederacy maintained neutrality during the Revolutionary War; thus, the statement is also False.
- Recruiting native allies did play an important role for the Spanish in the conquest of the Aztec, so the statement is True.
- Loyalists were not always well treated after the signing of the Treaty of Paris, which makes this statement False.
- The Treaty of Paris, for all practical purposes, did ignore the American Indians and their stake in the outcome of the war, making this statement True.
These details reflect the complex interactions between European powers and indigenous peoples, the nuances of historical treaties, and the intricate realities of historical conflicts and alliances.