Georges seems to have a positive and inclusive view on handicaps, while Hazel's view is uncertain.
Georges's view on handicaps: In the story, George appears to be more accepting and accommodating towards handicaps. He doesn't seem to see them as limitations and recognizes the potential and contributions of individuals with disabilities, as shown by his appreciation for the astronomers John Goodricke and Henrietta Leavitt. He believes that people with disabilities can still make fundamental contributions.
Hazel's view on handicaps: On the other hand, Hazel's view on handicaps is not explicitly mentioned in the information provided. Without further context, we cannot definitively say how her view might differ from George's view.
Overall, George seems to have a positive and inclusive view on handicaps, while Hazel's view is uncertain based on the given information.
The probable question may be:
What specific evidence or actions in the story suggest that Georges has a positive and inclusive view on handicaps, and why is Hazel's view on handicaps uncertain?