168k views
5 votes
There is further contradictory evidence for gender schema theory from C******* et al

a) Harrison and White
b) Davis and Wilson
c) Carter and Turner
d) Cooper and Smith

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The question is seeking the source of contradictory evidence for gender schema theory, presenting a multiple-choice list of authors. It relates to studies of gender roles and stereotypes in society, which is a topic within Social Studies at the College level.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question concerns contradictory evidence for gender schema theory from a study conducted by researchers whose names align with multiple-choice options. In this context, the theory refers to a cognitive theory that explains how individuals become gendered in society and how sex-linked characteristics are maintained and transmitted to other members of a culture. It's important to note that mixed findings in research regarding gender schema theory highlight the complex nature of understanding gender roles and stereotypes.

Studies such as those by Campbell and Storo (1994) and Hyde (2005) analyze myths, stereotypes, and differences related to gender but do not provide evidence specifically about the gender schema theory. Hyde's meta-analysis, for example, challenged widespread notions about gender and language. Smith's (2008) work on gender stereotypes in popular media further emphasizes the prevalence and impact of gendered perceptions. The alleged contradictory evidence from C******* et al. is likely addressing an aspect of how people perceive or enact gender roles, which could either support or refute elements of gender schema theory.

User SHS
by
8.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories