Final answer:
Finding facts to support an argument illustrates the critical thinking standard of accuracy, which ensures that premises are factually correct to support the argument's conclusion, while logic provides the structural integrity of the argument.
Step-by-step explanation:
The standard of critical thinking illustrated by finding facts to support an argument is accuracy. When we engage in critical thinking, especially in constructing or evaluating an argument, it is imperative that the factual claims presented as evidence are accurate, since they support the soundness of the conclusion. Logic also plays a crucial role as it is the framework within which the argument is structured, ensuring that the conclusion follows from the premises. In the context of a position argument or analyzing philosophical claims, logic is essential to ensure that the reasoning process which leads from one idea to another, formally known as an inference, indeed supports the conclusion drawn.
Essentially, logic serves as the foundation for assessing the quality of the reasoning in an argument, while facts or premises must be accurate to support the truthfulness of the conclusion. Thus, while logical analysis ascertains the structural integrity of the argument, determining the accuracy of the premises ensures that the conclusion is supported by truthful and factual statements.