Final answer:
The metaphor of building walls and hanging paintings without a skeleton represents an inefficient approach to script development, focusing on details before establishing the foundational structure. The correct interpretation of this metaphor in the context of scriptwriting is that one is being haphazard and inefficient, hence option B is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
The given metaphor about skipping the skeleton suggests a certain approach toward script development or creation in the performing arts. By constructing walls and hanging paintings simultaneously, rather than following a sequential order, the metaphor refers to the process of tackling different aspects of a script without first establishing a firm foundational structure—akin to focusing on the superficial aspects before the underpinning elements.
Let's apply this to the field of playwriting or scriptwriting. The skeleton represents the basic underlying structure of a story, including plot points, character development, and thematic elements. Conversely, the “walls” and “paintings” could metaphorically represent the intricacies and artistic details of the script, such as dialogue, jokes, and visual descriptions. Therefore, the correct option that describes the act of metaphorically building walls and hanging paintings at the same time without a skeleton is that B) You're approaching script development haphazardly and inefficiently. This option communicates the idea of focusing on minor details or decorative elements before the primary, unifying structure is in place.