Final answer:
To press charges for purse snatching, police must have probable cause to believe the individual committed the crime, which could involve direct evidence or witness testimony. Legal processes also include preliminary hearings to inform suspects of their rights. The scenario depicted employs psychological strategies to elicit confessions or evidence from suspects.
Step-by-step explanation:
To press charges for purse snatching, there must be a sufficient evidence to show that the crime has been committed. This includes but is not limited to direct evidence such as surveillance footage, witness testimony, and possession of the stolen property.
The police must have probable cause to believe that the person accused has committed the crime before an arrest can be made or charges pressed. The scenario discussed where suspects are separated and questioned about an armed robbery indicates a strategy police might use to establish guilt for a different crime, employing a combination of psychological pressure and the offer of a lesser punishment to encourage suspects to confess or provide evidence against each other.
The case involving the Confederate flag purses at Burleson High School illustrates the application of a school's dress code policy and the legal consequences of violating that policy, leading to an appeals court decision.
It is an example of how institutions maintain rules to guard against discrimination and maintain a safe, non-hostile environment. This is separate from criminal law but relevant to understanding how policies are enforced and challenged legally.
In the context of 'Criminal Justice: Theory Meets Practice,' before someone can be charged with a crime, there must typically be a preliminary hearing where the suspect is informed of their rights and the charges against them. Additionally, the Terry v. Ohio case emphasizes the right of police to stop and frisk a suspect if they have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and believe the person may be armed and dangerous.