Final answer:
The Supreme Court has recognized a right to privacy implied by the Constitution, particularly through the Ninth Amendment, and cases like Griswold v. Connecticut further established this interpretation. The Ninth Amendment acknowledges that rights exist beyond those listed, which has been applied to include privacy. The Tenth Amendment also has implications for personal liberties but mainly deals with states' powers.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Supreme Court has reasoned that a right to privacy is implicit within the Constitution, notably through the Ninth Amendment, which articulates that people's rights are not confined to those enumerated in the document. The Ninth Amendment has been interpreted to include protections for personal liberties (including privacy) that are not specifically listed in the Constitution. This interpretation, along with other amendments, protects citizens from unreasonable government intrusion.
It's important to note that other amendments, such as the Third and Fourth Amendments, have also been read to safeguard personal spaces against undue government interference. Furthermore, the Tenth Amendment reserves powers to the states or the people that are not expressly delegated to the federal government, which can intersect with privacy matters when it comes to state laws.
Justices like Brandeis have recognized privacy as a significant right, asserting the value of being left alone. Cases such as Griswold v. Connecticut, Roe v. Wade, and Lawrence v. Texas have all addressed aspects of privacy rights, indicating the Supreme Court's role in defining and applying these protections despite the lack of explicit mention in the Constitution.