Final answer:
Matching a procedure with a diagnosis for justification is termed as 'Medical necessity,' which involves hypothesis testing and logical reasoning processes like inductive or deductive reasoning, commonly utilized to formulate a diagnosis.
Step-by-step explanation:
Matching a procedure with the diagnosis describing why the procedure was done is known as Medical necessity. This is because it justifies the need for the procedure based on the diagnosis received. The process involves hypothesis testing based on sample evidence, which is a procedure for determining whether the hypothesis stated is a reasonable statement and should not be rejected, or is unreasonable and should be rejected. Medical professionals might use forms of logical thinking such as inductive or deductive reasoning to arrive at a diagnosis, which acts as a necessary condition for the medical treatment or procedure.
Deductive reasoning is defined as the form of reasoning that begins with a general theory and arrives at a specific conclusion after observing a body of information. Meanwhile, inductive reasoning is the process that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion, and is commonly used in formulating a diagnosis in medicine.
Forensic investigators and doctors alike use a form of reasoning called abduction to come up with the best explanation for an observed set of circumstances, such as the symptoms of an illness in the case of medical diagnoses.