Final answer:
Proactive deployment of personnel and equipment is crucial in emergency management, as shown by historical examples and current practices in civil services like healthcare and disaster preparedness.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement, 'In a major incident, personnel and equipment should be dispatched even without being requested,' highlights the importance of proactive emergency response. Historical examples show that field commanders in Korea took initiative by dispatching reinforcements without awaiting orders from Tokyo, and this decision was supported by Japanese public opinion. Similarly, in instances of severe winter weather or civil unrest, governors have the authority to activate the National Guard to assist in emergency efforts. This is an indication of the level of autonomy and readiness required to handle emergencies effectively and efficiently.
Preparation for emergencies is not only a military concern but also a major aspect of civil services. For instance, medical teams prepare for a variety of emergency scenarios, as indicated in the case where despite heavy casualties among staff, nurses were able to quickly set up an operating theater using available resources. In terms of infrastructure, governors and local officials collaborate to ensure that measures like emergency shelters and travel bans are in place in anticipation of natural disasters.
All these examples underscore the principle of swift and decisive action in emergency management, where the availability of material and manpower is crucial, reflecting the sentiment in the statement that personnel and equipment should be deployed proactively during major incidents.