Final answer:
Just claims that belong to a person by law, nature, or tradition encompass both unalienable natural rights such as life and liberty, and legal rights granted by a legal system.
The practical application and recognition of these rights can vary, including formal treaty-based rights and the impact of societal privilege on the experience of these rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
Just claims that belong to a person by law, nature, or tradition are a complex web of entitlements that are recognized in different ways depending on the legal, cultural, and societal frameworks in place.
The concept of unalienable rights, such as life, liberty, and the right to own property, stems from the idea that there are fundamental rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of the law of the land. These are often referred to as natural rights and are seen as universal and inalienable, meaning they cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws.
By contrast, legal rights are those granted by a specific legal system and can be modified or constrained by human legislation. This category includes rights that are considered common-law rights, deriving from judicial precedents and traditions, as well as statutory rights established by legislative bodies.
In addition to personal rights, certain group or population rights may be recognized formally through treaties, although the practical acknowledgment of these treaty-based rights varies greatly among nations.
For example, the Indian Claims in the United States addressed reparations for past breaches of duties by the federal government. Furthermore, the concept of privilege can also play a role in how rights are experienced differently by various groups within society.