Final answer:
No, there is no guarantee that the behavior of people will follow a Court Decision. The enforcement of rulings depends on the cooperation of governmental branches and the public, illustrating the separation of powers and potential for defiance as seen in historical examples.
Step-by-step explanation:
After a Court Decision, there is no guarantee that the actions or behavior of the people will follow the ruling. The influence of a court's decision, such as those by the Supreme Court, on societal behavior is not absolute. Courts can determine the constitutionality of laws and actions, but their power ends there; enforcement and implementation require the cooperation of other branches of government and the public. Judicial implementation is a critical aspect of this process, reflecting the courts' reliance on other entities to enforce their decisions.
Historic examples include President Andrew Jackson defying the Supreme Court ruling on Native American lands and Abraham Lincoln ignoring a ruling on the suspension of habeas corpus rights. The principle of stare decisis contributes to legal stability, but public opinion and subsequent legislative or executive action can alter how and whether court decisions are translated into practice.