12.0k views
2 votes
(T/F)The plaintiffs in Case #8 (Vazquez) and Case #9 (Stalter) both had their discrimination claims dismissed on summary judgment because they could not prove pretext.

User Bitkid
by
8.5k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

The plaintiffs in Case #8 (Vazquez) and Case #9 (Stalter) did not have their discrimination claims dismissed on summary judgment because they could not prove pretext.

Step-by-step explanation:

The plaintiffs in Case #8 (Vazquez) and Case #9 (Stalter) did not have their discrimination claims dismissed on summary judgment because they could not prove pretext. In Case #8, Vazquez's claim was dismissed because he could not show that he was paid less than an employee of another race with similar qualifications. In Case #9, Stalter's claim was dismissed because he could not prove that the employer had a discriminatory motive in the adverse employment decision.

User Lfurini
by
8.5k points