Final answer:
The statement is false; it incorrectly connects the details of Rucker v. Higher Educ. Aids Board with the Grutter v. Bollinger case. The actual Grutter case, which involved the University of Michigan Law School's admissions policy, centered around the use of race as a 'plus factor' in admissions and was upheld by the Supreme Court.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement concerning the case Rucker v. Higher Educ. Aids Board, 669 F.2d 1179 (7th Cir. 1982) is false. In this case, the plaintiff did not lose due to an inability to prove personal victimization by race discrimination.
It seems there is a mix-up with the facts of the case. The case synopsis provided pertains instead to Grutter v. Bollinger and the topic of affirmative action in university admissions policies. In Grutter v. Bollinger, the Supreme Court, affirming the decision of the Sixth Circuit, upheld the University of Michigan Law School's use of race as a "plus factor" in their admissions policy in line with the Equal Protection Clause. This case reaffirmed the principle that schools may use race as one factor among others in admission decisions to achieve a diverse student body.
Moreover, important precedent cases like Regents of the University of California v. Bakke and Brown v. Board of Education highlight the longstanding constitutional debates surrounding race, equality, and educational admissions policies in the United States. These discussions continue to evolve as the nation grapples with the challenge of balancing a pursuit of diversity with the principles of merit and a color-blind interpretation of the law.