Final answer:
The Supreme Court's actions to invalidate parts of federal laws exhibit the judiciary's power within the system of checks and balances. Such decisions illustrate the role the Court plays in reviewing the constitutionality of laws and balancing federal and state powers.
Step-by-step explanation:
Supreme Court actions to void parts of the Violence Against Women Act and the Americans With Disabilities Act are examples of the judiciary's power to strike down laws and other government actions as unconstitutional. This ability is a foundational aspect of the federal design of the U.S. Constitution and the system of checks and balances, which also influences the federal response to national issues.
In certain cases, the Supreme Court has limited the reach of federal powers. For example, the Supreme Court's interference with provisions of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) and other acts reflects its role in balancing the power between the federal government and the states. These actions can often stem from challenges by states or individuals who question the constitutionality of federal laws. Moreover, the Court's decisions sometimes navigate through complex issues of federalism, such as in cases where the federal government is seen to directly mandate state and local action.