Final answer:
Justices decide which cases they will hear based on a group decision called a conference.
Step-by-step explanation:
Supreme Court decisions during the era of the Roberts Court reflected a leaning toward conservative ideologies, particularly on issues like environmental protection and partial-birth abortions. The Court exhibited a nuanced approach, showcasing elements of both judicial activism and restraint.
In cases involving societal changes and individual rights, the Court engaged in judicial activism, actively interpreting the Constitution. Conversely, in matters emphasizing states' rights over federal power, such as the Gun-Free School Zone Act, the Court demonstrated judicial restraint and strict constructionism. By interpreting the Constitution based on perceived original intentions, the Court underscored a commitment to limiting federal authority. This multifaceted approach illustrates the complex interplay of conservative principles, judicial activism, and deference to constitutional interpretation within the decisions of the Roberts Court during that period.