141k views
5 votes
No arbitrary, capricious, abuse of doctrine, violate law. under this standard, parties can challenge regulations as contrary to law or as so irrational that they are not arbitrary and capricious. the standard includes factors such as whether the agency has done any of the following:

1. failed to provide a rational explanation for its decision
2. changed its prior policy without justification
3. considered legally inappropriate factors
4. entirely failed to consider a relevant factor
5. rendered a decision plainly contrary to the evidence.

User Rover
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The standard used to challenge regulations is the rational basis test. This test requires those challenging the law or action to demonstrate that there is no good reason for treating them differently from other citizens. It is used in various contexts such as discrimination cases, land-use regulations, and religious freedom cases.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is asking about the standard used to challenge regulations that may be considered arbitrary, capricious, or in violation of the law. This standard is known as the rational basis test. Under the rational basis test, the burden of proof is on those challenging the law or action to demonstrate that there is no good reason for treating them differently from other citizens. The courts apply this standard to determine whether a regulation is contrary to law or so irrational that it is not arbitrary and capricious.

The rational basis test is used in various contexts, such as discrimination cases, land-use regulations, and religious freedom cases. In discrimination cases, the courts will generally decide that a discriminatory practice is allowed as long as there is a reason for treating some people differently that is rationally related to a legitimate government interest. In land-use regulations, the question is how far these regulations may go without running into constitutional issues. In religious freedom cases, the government must meet two criteria to limit or burden a religious practice: demonstrate a compelling governmental interest and show that the restriction is narrowly tailored.

Overall, the rational basis test is a standard used by the courts to determine the legality and rationality of regulations or actions, considering factors such as legality, appropriateness, evidence, and discrimination.

User Killthrush
by
7.8k points