Final answer:
Judges practicing judicial activism interject their own values into their interpretation of cases, resulting in the creation of policy without the authority of the people or their elected representatives.
Step-by-step explanation:
Judges practicing judicial activism interject their own values into their interpretation of cases. Judicial activism refers to when judges use their powers of judicial review to create policy without the authority of the people or their elected representatives. They may strike down a law or make a decision based on personal reasons rather than adhering strictly to the constitution.