Final answer:
The question discusses the legal context of agency, emphasizing the exclusivity of an agent serving a single principal but allows for the principal to have multiple agents. It highlights the importance of an agent's free actions as essential in initiating actions on behalf of the principal.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the situation in which an agent may serve only one principal at a time, under normal circumstances within the realm of law. Nevertheless, a principal can have multiple agents representing their interests. The heart of the question seems to revolve around the concept of agency in law, where the free action of an agent is a significant factor.
In agency law, the principal-agent relationship is one where the agent acts on behalf of the principal. The situation described assumes exclusivity on the part of the agent towards the principal, suggesting a commonly accepted expectation within legal frameworks. Exclusivity within agency is usually vital to prevent conflicts of interest or divided loyalties. However, it's also recognized that an agent's existence alone does not necessitate action, but rather it's the agent's free choices that initiate actions on behalf of the principal.