Final answer:
The statement 'FLC should increase parking fees' is an evaluative claim used in argumentative contexts, where it prescribes a course of action based on the value judgment of the speaker or writer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement "FLC should increase parking fees" is an example of an evaluative claim. Evaluative claims express a judgment about the value or worth of something and are often prescriptive, suggesting what ought to be done. They differ from factual statements which describe things as they are, without offering an opinion on them. In the case of evaluative claims, they are tied to arguments that are supported by evidence and aim to persuade the audience to adopt a particular viewpoint or action.
When writing about issues such as campus parking, it is important to distinguish between fact and opinion. While a factual claim would be something like 'the campus parking lot is full,' an evaluative claim like the one in question interprets the situation and prescribes a solution based on the value or belief that higher parking fees could address the parking issue.