Final answer:
Autonomy is a form of personal liberty, its legal equivalent is self-determination, and it is indeed based on a person's right to make choices, which includes personal and economic freedoms. Progressive employee discipline, however, is not necessarily a support for autonomy as it refers to managing and correcting employee behavior.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering autonomy and the employee, several statements are true. Autonomy is indeed a form of personal liberty, making that an accurate statement. This is because having liberty allows individuals to make everyday choices that affect their lives, including decisions about where to work, what to study, and other personal matters without government intervention.
Additionally, autonomy's legal equivalent is self-determination, which includes the components of the rights to privacy, self-determination, and freedom of expression that are essential according to human rights norms. This legal concept is based on the principle that people have the right to make choices and decisions regarding their personal lives, embodying the idea of autonomy.
Lastly, autonomy is certainly based on a person's right to make a choice, a central aspect of personal and economic freedom. Whether deciding what to buy, where to work, or what personal goals to pursue, the ability to make these choices is a reflection of one's autonomy and the moral value society places on respecting these choices.
However, the idea that autonomy is supported by the process of progressive employee discipline does not align with the concept of worker autonomy. Discipline processes are designed to correct and manage employee behavior, which can sometimes be at odds with personal autonomy.