Question

Other things being equal, the more relevant similarities there are between the things being compared in an analogical argument, the more probable the conclusion.

Answer 1

Analogical arguments rely on comparing two things and drawing conclusions based on their similarities. The more relevant similarities there are between the things being compared, the more probable the conclusion.

Step-by-step explanation:

Analogical arguments rely on comparing two things and drawing conclusions based on their similarities. According to David Hume, the more relevant similarities there are between the things being compared, the more probable the conclusion. This means that the more closely each thing resembles the other, the more accurate the conclusion.

1. Start by identifying the two things being compared in the analogical argument.
2. Examine the relevant similarities between the two things.
3. Evaluate the strength of the similarities. The more relevant and strong the similarities, the more probable the conclusion.

An example inductive argument can be used to understand the concept better. If two studies show a correlation between exercise and improved health, the conclusion can be made that exercise is beneficial for health. The more studies and evidence showing this correlation, the stronger the argument becomes.