Final answer:
The statement is false. In political bargaining, signaling the end of concessions is not necessarily important as negotiations can collapse when parties have opposing goals and are unwilling to compromise.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement, 'It is important to signal to the other party with either behavior or words that the concessions are almost over' is false.
In political bargaining, signaling the end of concessions is not necessarily important. Negotiations can collapse when parties have opposing goals and are unwilling to compromise. In such situations, the status quo prevails. Additionally, successful negotiations can result in outcomes where both parties are relatively satisfied, even if there are winners and losers.