Final answer:
Political bargaining can be a delicate balance, with those in favor of the status quo potentially working against change. However, successful negotiations and international agreements can lead to positive outcomes and balance of interests. Realism in international relations suggests some secrecy is needed to maintain leverage in negotiations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The assertion that preventing the other negotiator from becoming committed is important because the advantages of a committed position can work against the negotiator is somewhat true in political bargaining. However, preventing the other party's commitment is not always feasible or ethical. Political negotiations often involve a complex interplay of principles, strategic choices, and the reality at the time of the negotiation. Those in favor of the status quo may indeed work against change, as they benefit from current circumstances. Yet, negotiations can also lead to positive outcomes with each side finding some level of satisfaction, particularly when compromises are made, or when a third party can enforce cooperation.
Realist perspectives in international relations suggest that complete transparency during negotiations can make a state vulnerable, thereby advocating for a certain level of secrecy to maintain leverage. Nonetheless, this does not preclude the potential for successful outcomes through diligent negotiation and finding common ground where possible. In cases of international trade, agreements may balance domestic concerns with global benefits, as competition from foreign firms can drive innovation and provide consumers with better or cheaper products, while some businesses increase profits and employees potentially earn more income.