Final answer:
A businesswoman analyzing the costs and benefits of her decisions is using a consequentialist form of moral reasoning, specifically utilitarianism, which aims to maximize the good for the most people.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a businesswoman is considering the consequences of her possible choices, analyzing both their costs and benefits, she is engaging in a form of consequentialist moral reasoning. Specifically, this approach aligns with utilitarianism, which advocates for actions that provide the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This philosophy evaluates the moral worth of different courses of action based on their outcomes, rather than on any inherent qualities of the actions themselves or any set of prescribed rules.
Consequentialism encompasses various ethical theories, among which utilitarianism is a prominent example that focuses on maximizing overall happiness and reducing suffering. The businesswoman's consideration of costs and benefits across a spectrum of stakeholders reflects this utilitarian calculus, taking a broader view of the impact of her business decisions beyond personal gain.
Furthermore, this perspective on moral philosophy is indicative of contemporary ethical thinking, wherein individuals and businesses are increasingly expected to consider the wider social and environmental consequences of their economic choices. This consideration is thought to reflect a moral philosophy that values both personal choice and the collective good.