Final answer:
True, A search warrant typically encompasses the authority to search outbuildings within the premises' curtilage, under the Fourth Amendment, which requires a reasonable search and seizure and particular description of the place and items. Legal interpretations may vary and evidence obtained improperly may be excluded as "fruit of the poisonous tree."
Step-by-step explanation:
A search warrant that authorizes officers to search premises typically includes the authority to search all outbuildings within the curtilage of the main premises, even if these outbuildings are not explicitly named in the warrant. This is because the curtilage is considered part of the property associated with the privacy expectations of a dwelling, akin to the home itself. However, warrants must still meet the Fourth Amendment requirements, which mandate that searches and seizures be reasonable, and the warrant must describe with particularity the place to be searched and the items to be seized.
In practice, specifics can vary depending on jurisdiction and the exact circumstances of the case. It is generally true that a search warrant covers the curtilage, but there are exceptions, and interpretation of such legal scenarios should ideally be made by legal professionals who can assess all relevant factors. Notably, any evidence obtained from an area not covered by the search warrant may be excluded under the doctrine known as the "fruit of the poisonous tree", which aims to prevent the use of evidence acquired through violations of the Fourth Amendment.