Final answer:
In Georgia v. Randolph (2006), the Supreme Court ruled that LEOs cannot enter a defendant's home to make an arrest without a search warrant when consent has not been given and there are no exigent circumstances. The Fourth Amendment also requires a search warrant prior to a search or seizure, unless certain exceptions apply.
Step-by-step explanation:
In Georgia v. Randolph (2006), the Supreme Court ruled that when consent has not been given and there are no exigent circumstances, law enforcement officers (LEOs) who wish to enter a defendant's home to make an arrest must have a search warrant.
In Georgia v. Randolph (2006), the Supreme Court ruled that LEOs cannot enter a defendant's home to make an arrest without a search warrant when consent has not been given and there are no exigent circumstances. The Fourth Amendment also requires a search warrant prior to a search or seizure, unless certain exceptions apply.
This means that LEOs cannot conduct a warrantless search in a home where one occupant consents and the other objects. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution also requires government officials to apply for and receive a search warrant prior to a search or seizure, unless certain exceptions apply.